Business & Finance

ADHD’nin İş Yerlerini Yeniden Şekillendirmesi: Patronlar ve Çalışanlar İçin Anlamı

ADHD, yani Dikkat Eksikliği ve Hiperaktivite Bozukluğu, son yıllarda iş yerlerini köklü bir şekilde etkiledi. Bir Lidl mağazasında müdür y

ADHD, yani Dikkat Eksikliği ve Hiperaktivite Bozukluğu, son yıllarda iş yerlerini köklü bir şekilde etkiledi. Bir Lidl mağazasında müdür yardımcısı olan Ryan’ın hikayesi, bu değişimin ne kadar derin olduğunu gösteriyor. 18 ay boyunca bu durumu düşünmekten kendini alamamış. Sonunda, işverenine bu durumu bildirdiğinde, sonuçları ağır oldu. Ryan, işten çıkarıldı ama bu durumu kabullenmedi. Mahkemeye başvurdu ve 45,000 sterlin tazminat kazandı. Mahkeme, işverenin ona yeterli düzenlemeleri sağlamadığını ve buna bağlı olarak haksız yere işten çıkarıldığına karar verdi. Ryan’ın yaşadığı bu deneyim, birçok insanın benzer sorunlarla karşılaştığını ortaya koyuyor.

Son yıllarda, otizm, ADHD, disleksi gibi nöroçeşitlilik durumlarına tanı konan insanların sayısı hızla arttı. 2020’de 265 olan iş mahkemesi vakası, 2025’te 517’ye çıktı. İşverenlerin bu duruma dikkat etmesi gerektiği konusunda avukatlar ve insan kaynakları uzmanları hemfikir. Nöroçeşitlilik, artık iş yerlerinde sıkça tartışılan bir konu haline geldi. Ancak, birçok çalışan, teşhis edilmeden veya gerekli düzenlemeler yapılmadan iş hayatına atılıyor. Özellikle, İngiltere’de NHS bekleme listeleri rekor seviyelere ulaştı ve bazı bölgelerde kapanmak zorunda kaldı.

Aynı zamanda, birçok insanın bu durumları göz ardı edildi. Örneğin, College London’un verilerine göre, 40 yaş üstü otistik bireylerin %90’ı tanı almamış durumda. Bu, toplumun nöroçeşitliliğe yönelik farkındalığının arttığını gösteriyor ama aynı zamanda da yetersiz kalıyor. Çalışanlar artık sessiz kalmak istemiyor, yaşadıkları zorlukları dile getirmeye başladı. Çeşitlilik ve kapsayıcılık danışmanı Lutfur Ali, işverenlerin doğru eğitim ve zaman almadıklarını vurguluyor.

Birçok işyeri, bu durumu kabullenmekte zorluk çekiyor. İşverenler, bir çalışana yapılan ayarlamanın diğerlerine de yapılması gerektiğini düşünüyorlar. Ancak, çoğu durumda düzenlemeler maliyet açısından oldukça düşük. Örneğin, toplantı yapma yöntemlerini değiştirmek veya çalışanlara düzenli molalar vermek gibi basit ayarlar, hem çalışanların performansını artırıyor hem de işyerindeki genel atmosferi olumlu yönde etkiliyor.

Geçen yıl bir mahkemede, Greene King adlı bir pub zincirinin, disleksi sorunları olan bir aşçı için makul düzenlemeler yapmadığına karar verildi. Aşçının işten çıkarılması, bu düzenlemelerin olmaması nedeniyle gerçekleşti ve kendisine 24,000 sterlin tazminat verildi. İşverenlerin, bu gibi durumlarda tazminat ödemekten kaçınmaları, onları daha dikkatli olmaya itiyor.

Daniel Rickman, Structura adlı bir cam işleme şirketinin sahibi, çalışanlarının ayarlamalar istemesini beklemeden, bu ayarlamaları herkese sunmaya karar verdi. Şirket, esnek çalışma saatleri uyguladı, toplantı odalarına stres topu gibi oyuncaklar koydu ve çalışanın rahatsız edilip edilmeyeceğini belirten renkli ışıklar ekledi. Rickman, bu uygulamanın, herkesin en iyi şekilde çalışmasına yardımcı olduğunu belirtiyor.

Bütün bu durumlar, işverenlerin nöroçeşitlilik konularında daha fazla bilgi sahibi olmaları gerektiğini ortaya koyuyor. Ancak, bazı işverenler hala bu durumu kabullenmekte zorlanıyor. Gelecekte, bu iş yerlerinde nasıl bir dönüşüm yaşanacak? Belki de daha fazla değişikliğe ihtiyaç duyulacak…

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

How ADHD is Transforming Workplaces: A New Era for Employees and Employers

ADHD has fundamentally changed the workplace dynamics, and it’s crucial for both bosses and workers to understand what this means. Take the case of

ADHD has fundamentally changed the workplace dynamics, and it’s crucial for both bosses and workers to understand what this means. Take the case of Ryan, a former deputy store manager at Lidl, who found himself in a tough spot after discussing his ADHD diagnosis with his higher-ups. After a meeting where he expressed he needed accommodations, Ryan was dismissed for gross misconduct. But he didn’t back down; he appealed the decision, which led to a tribunal awarding him over £45,000. The judge ruled that his former employer failed to provide reasonable adjustments, like additional breaks, which could have made a significant difference for him. “I don’t show a lot of emotions,” Ryan stated, yet this emotional struggle echoed throughout the tribunal’s findings.

This case is just a snapshot of a growing trend. Over the last few years, thousands have been diagnosed as neurodivergent, a term that encompasses not just ADHD, but also autism and dyslexia. These diagnoses have become more common in disputes within employment tribunals. Interestingly, many neurodivergent individuals are entitled to reasonable adjustments if they can demonstrate that their condition significantly affects their daily activities. Lutfur Ali, a diversity and inclusion adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, points out that businesses are lagging behind in making the necessary adjustments. “Employers often don’t have the training or the time to have the right conversations,” he explains.

The numbers are staggering. In 2025 alone, there were 517 employment tribunal cases mentioning neurodivergent conditions, a significant rise from 265 in 2020. The most frequently cited conditions? You guessed it—autism and ADHD. The Ministry of Justice cautions that these figures should not be seen as official statistics, but they do paint a picture of a growing concern. Diagnosis rates for ADHD and autism have surged, and waiting lists for assessments on the NHS in England are reaching record levels, with some areas even closing their lists due to overwhelming demand. Irwin Mitchell highlights that these long waits are affecting workplaces. “Anecdotally, we’re seeing the consequences,” they say.

Moreover, a study from University College London found that around 90% of autistic individuals over 40 remain undiagnosed. This lack of diagnosis doesn’t just affect individuals; it has broader implications for workplace culture and understanding. There’s a growing awareness of the challenges that neurodivergent individuals face—issues like masking and overall wellbeing. “Society is playing catch-up,” says one expert, emphasizing the explosion in recognition of adult neurodivergence.

This shift in understanding is crucial. Many individuals are now refusing to suffer in silence, demanding workplaces that accommodate their unique needs. A recent survey found that businesses are adapting their policies, with many employers now considering “neurodivergent readiness” in their hiring and management practices. However, some employers still feel overwhelmed, fearing that making accommodations for one employee might set a precedent for others. “It’s a mindset issue,” notes a diversity consultant.

On the flip side, some businesses are taking proactive steps. For instance, Daniel Rickman, who runs Structura, a glazing company, decided not to wait for staff to request adjustments. Instead, he implemented flexible working hours, introduced fidget toys in meeting rooms, and even set up red and green “busy lights” to indicate availability. This approach, he argues, allows his business to get the best out of everyone.

But here’s the kicker: the tribunal system is under immense pressure, with open claims hitting record highs. Jenna Ide, an employment law specialist, notes that some tribunal dates are being pushed to 2030, creating a backlog that could exacerbate workplace tensions. With the Employment Rights Act changing the landscape in January 2027—providing workers protection against unfair dismissal after just six months—experts predict a surge in claims. “There’s going to be a huge explosion in unfair dismissal claims,” warns Irwin Mitchell.

So, what does this all mean for the future? Ryan, who has struggled with health issues since leaving Lidl, feels conflicted about disclosing his diagnosis to potential employers. Despite the challenges, he remains hopeful that workplace changes will eventually benefit everyone. “You’ve got to manage people differently if they’re neurodivergent,” he asserts.

As we look ahead, will workplaces finally adapt to these changing dynamics? Only time will tell…

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

Trump’s Bold Move: Investigating EU Over Tech Company Fines

US President Donald Trump has fired a shot across the bow of European regulators once again. He announced that the United States will launch a formal

US President Donald Trump has fired a shot across the bow of European regulators once again. He announced that the United States will launch a formal investigation into the European Union, and he’s not holding back on the threats either—hinting at new tariffs in response to hefty fines slapped on major American tech companies. This comes right on the heels of the European Commission’s staggering €890 million ($1 billion) fine against Google for practices that allegedly stifled competition.

In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump didn’t mince words about the EU’s actions. He proclaimed, “The EU will pay a very big price. The United States of America is not a ‘PIGGYBANK’ for Europe, nor will we allow it to be!” It’s tough talk, and he backed it up by stating that any fines imposed should be “entirely reversed” and replaced with “a substantial TARIFF.” If you’re wondering what that means, it’s basically a way to hit back at Europe economically.

But wait, there’s more. Trump didn’t stop there; he declared that the US would “immediately initiate a 301 investigation” into the practices of European regulators. Now, what’s this 301 investigation all about? Well, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 gives the Office of the United States Trade Representative the power to look into trade practices that are deemed unfair. And let me tell you, Trump’s administration has been quite busy with these investigations since last year.

Just a day before this announcement, Trump revealed new tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on 60 trading partners, including the EU, the UK, and China. José Castañeda, a spokesperson for Google, told the BBC that they’ve been putting in the effort to comply with Europe’s Digital Markets Act, but it seems that compliance didn’t save them from that hefty fine.

In Trump’s fiery post, he also mentioned that other tech giants are not off the hook either. He claimed that Apple was hit with EU fines amounting to $15 billion, Meta was fined $3 billion, and Amazon faced $2.5 billion in penalties. It’s a staggering amount that has caught the attention of many. Representatives from Meta, Apple, and Amazon, as well as the European Commission, have all been approached for comments, but we’re still waiting to hear back.

Interestingly, just before Trump was elected president in 2024, he revealed that Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, reached out to him directly to voice concerns over the fines the company had received. That call came shortly after Apple lost a protracted battle over unpaid taxes, and it seems like the stakes are only getting higher.

So here we are, with Trump taking a firm stance, and the question looms—how will Europe respond to this latest wave of American outrage? Will there be a tit-for-tat escalation in tariffs, or can cooler heads prevail?

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

Trump Tariffs: Are They Really Working or Just Causing More Frustration?

Tariffs have been a hot topic during President Trump’s administration, and it seems like they just keep coming. From trade wars to economic debates,

Tariffs have been a hot topic during President Trump’s administration, and it seems like they just keep coming. From trade wars to economic debates, the impact of these tariffs on the U.S. economy is a question many are asking. Samira Hussain dives deep into this issue, explaining how these tariffs are affecting American consumers and producers alike.

So, what’s the deal with these tariffs? Well, they aim to protect U.S. industries, but who really bears the burden? It turns out, it’s often the average American who pays the price. With prices on everyday goods rising, folks are left wondering if these tariffs are truly beneficial or just a source of frustration. Remember when Trump announced a hefty 50% tariff in response to Canada’s treatment of U.S. farmers? The outrage was palpable. Many farmers felt caught in the crossfire, saying it’s just plain frustrating.

And it’s not just farmers feeling the heat. Military recruiters in Ukraine are reportedly facing violence, and that’s another story that’s making waves. The ripple effects of tariffs and international policies are everywhere, and the consequences are far-reaching.

As we navigate through these turbulent economic waters, the question remains: Are these tariffs really working, or are they just adding to the chaos? Can the U.S. economy withstand this pressure, or is it time for a reassessment?

Bakalım, bu durumda neler olacak? Gelişmeleri takip ediyoruz…

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

BAE CEO’su Uyarıyor: İngiltere Savaş Tehdidine Karşı Şu An Daha Fazla Dikkat Etmeli!

The UK has been warned about its complacency regarding the risk of foreign attacks. Dr. Charles Woodburn, the CEO of BAE Systems, expressed serious

The UK has been warned about its complacency regarding the risk of foreign attacks. Dr. Charles Woodburn, the CEO of BAE Systems, expressed serious concerns in a rare interview with the BBC, stating that this is “by far the most threatening time I’ve seen.” He mentioned that the realities of modern warfare have changed profoundly, and adversaries are becoming incredibly adept at developing unmanned capabilities that can counter and deter aggression. Woodburn emphasized that the combination of traditional and unmanned warfare strategies is what leads to victory.

In addition, he welcomed the recent boost in defense spending, but he made it clear that much more investment is needed to adhere to the government’s policy of maintaining human control in military operations. According to Woodburn, the UK’s defense spending is projected to reach only 2.68% of GDP by 2030, well below the 3% threshold he believes is necessary. A further increase to 3.5% is required by 2035 to effectively tackle the threats posed by adversaries.

Former Defense Secretary John Healey’s promotion to Chancellor was viewed positively by Woodburn. Healey had previously resigned from his position, protesting against the insufficient funding for defense. After his resignation, an additional £15 billion was allocated to the defense budget, but it still falls short of what is necessary. Woodburn acknowledged the competition for resources within the government, saying, “We have tremendous respect for John,” and he believes Healey’s understanding of defense requirements is crucial.

During the Farnborough International Airshow, UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham sent a video message highlighting that defense could play a significant role in his plans to reindustrialize the economy and provide thousands of skilled jobs. Defense Secretary Wes Streeting also emphasized the importance of maximizing value for money while cutting waste in defense spending.

Woodburn’s remarks raise an important question: does he ever lose sleep over the fact that the products his company makes are ultimately designed for warfare? His concerns reflect a growing anxiety within the defense community regarding the balance between security and ethical considerations in modern warfare.

Bakalım, bu yeni savunma harcamalarıyla birlikte, tehditlere karşı nasıl bir hazırlık içinde olacağız? Gelişmeleri takip ediyoruz…

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

US Imposes New Tariffs on 60 Trade Partners Over Forced Labour Concerns

The US is taking a bold step by imposing new tariffs on around 60 trading partners, who account for a huge chunk of its imports. This decision comes

The US is taking a bold step by imposing new tariffs on around 60 trading partners, who account for a huge chunk of its imports. This decision comes in response to claims that these countries have failed to adequately address forced labour issues. The tariffs, which range from 10% to 12.5%, target significant economic players including the UK, China, the EU, Canada, Japan, and India. This new measure kicks in on Friday, just as a temporary 10% tax on foreign goods introduced earlier this year is about to expire.

The timing of this move is crucial. It marks the latest escalation in the global trade war, a conflict that was reignited by former President Donald Trump when he returned to office last year. Notably, the US Supreme Court recently ruled that many tariffs imposed globally under emergency powers were enacted illegally. Since then, the president has been scrambling for other legal avenues to push forward his trade policy agenda. Just last month, the White House proposed a series of duties on goods entering the US from various countries, highlighting concerns that these nations weren’t doing enough to combat forced labour practices.

On Thursday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer made a statement under Trump’s directive. He cited Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which governs trade enforcement practices that burden or restrict American commerce. Earlier in the week, the Trump administration had invoked a different statute, Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, to impose a staggering 50% tariff on products coming from Canada. That’s right, 50%!

The Office of the US Trade Representative confirmed that these latest tariffs are being imposed on the top 60 US trade partners, covering an astounding 99.4% of US imports. The office mentioned that during his second term, Trump had made the adoption of a ban on imports made with forced labour a critical priority. They’ve made commitments to not only adopt but also effectively enforce these bans. This push has been bolstered by trading partners who are hastily moving to adopt prohibitions on forced labour imports, and the US is keen on ensuring these measures are enforced effectively.

So here we are, folks. The stakes are high, and the future of international trade hangs in the balance. Will these tariffs make a real difference in the fight against forced labour? Or are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg in a much larger trade war? Only time will tell…

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

US Imposes New Tariffs Over Forced Labour Concerns: What You Need to Know

The US is set to impose new tariffs on imports from around 60 trading partners amid serious claims that these countries have not effectively stopped

The US is set to impose new tariffs on imports from around 60 trading partners amid serious claims that these countries have not effectively stopped forced labour practices. These tariffs, which range from 10% to 12.5%, specifically target major economic allies like the UK, EU, Canada, Japan, and India, and they are scheduled to take effect this Friday. This latest move marks another chapter in the ongoing global trade war, which flared up again when former President Donald Trump took office in January last year.

Earlier this year, the US Supreme Court ruled that many tariffs imposed globally under emergency powers were enacted illegally. In response, Trump has been actively seeking other legal routes to pursue his aggressive trade policy. He has consistently utilized tariffs to stimulate US manufacturing jobs and bolster the American economy. However, it’s not just about trade; Trump has also flexed his tariff muscles to pressure countries like Mexico over non-trade issues, such as labor regulations.

In recent days, the White House has particularly singled out Canadian imports, issuing a stark warning that goods crossing the northern border could face tariffs as high as 50%. Economists are sounding the alarm, suggesting that these higher tariffs could make everyday items—think coffee, microwaves, and more—much more expensive. The reality is that these extra costs are usually passed down to consumers by importing companies, hitting shoppers right in their wallets.

The White House argues that these tariffs are essential for protecting American workers and ensuring fair competition in the market. However, business groups and affected countries are gearing up to push back. Many trading partners are already considering potential legal challenges or retaliatory tariffs in response to the US’s bold move.

Moreover, the administration is not stopping here. The US Trade Representative is currently investigating 16 countries that account for a significant chunk of US imports, focusing on claims of manufacturing overcapacity. This could pave the way for even more tariffs later in the year, raising the stakes even higher in this already tense situation.

So, what’s next in this unfolding drama? Will these tariffs really protect American workers, or will they just hurt consumers? The situation is evolving, and we’re keeping an eye on how these developments unfold…

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

Oil Prices Surge to $100 Amid Middle East Tensions!

Oil prices have soared to $100 a barrel for the first time since May, igniting a wave of concern over global energy supplies as the conflict in the M

Oil prices have soared to $100 a barrel for the first time since May, igniting a wave of concern over global energy supplies as the conflict in the Middle East escalates. Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, jumped by more than 6% on Thursday after several days of steady increases, driven largely by the U.S. intensifying its military actions against Iran. The situation took a sharp turn when Houthi militia forces in Yemen launched attacks on oil tankers in the Red Sea, directly threatening a crucial export route that Saudi Arabia has been utilizing to circumvent the Strait of Hormuz.

Now, let’s break it down. Gas prices have also been on an upward trajectory, creeping up over the past month. The benchmark UK gas price is hovering around 150 per therm, which is a significant rise from approximately 98p at the end of June. Notably, oil prices had been on a downward trend following a temporary ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran, dipping back to levels last seen before the U.S. and Israel ramped up military actions against Iran on February 28. But, the ceasefire? Well, it’s officially over now!

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently pointed out that the Iranian leadership is “not ready to make a deal,” showing zero tolerance for the persistently high inflation that’s been plaguing the global economy. President Trump, during a meeting last month, reaffirmed his commitment to “restoring price stability” amid the chaos stemming from the Middle East conflict affecting prices worldwide. So, you see, the stakes are high, and the pressure is mounting on global energy markets.

What does this mean for the everyday consumer? Well, we might just see a ripple effect on our wallets. With rising oil prices, the cost of transportation and goods will likely increase, which can further strain household budgets already feeling the pinch. So, the big question is: how long will this volatility last? Are we headed for more price hikes, or will some resolution come about to stabilize the situation? Only time will tell…

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

Wealthy Brits Call for Higher Taxes: A Letter to Prime Minister Burnham

Millionaires across the UK, including former football star Gary Lineker and music producer Brian Eno, have banded together to send a powerful message

Millionaires across the UK, including former football star Gary Lineker and music producer Brian Eno, have banded together to send a powerful message to the newly appointed Prime Minister Andy Burnham. In an open letter, a group of 120 affluent Britons declared their willingness to be taxed more, claiming, “We can afford it.” This strong statement is organized by Patriotic Millionaires, a group advocating for a fairer tax system that promotes a more equal society.

The letter emphasizes the need for a 2% tax on wealth exceeding £10 million, which they argue would significantly contribute to reducing income inequality in the nation. Lineker, who is among the signatories, has been vocal about his support for this initiative, asserting that wealthy individuals should actively participate in efforts to support the country’s economy. Other notable signatories include Richard Curtis, the director of “Notting Hill,” and Ian Gregg, the former managing director of the bakery chain Greggs.

The letter highlights a patriotic sentiment, stating, “Millionaires are a patriotic bunch. We love this country, and we want it to succeed.” The call for increased taxes is not just about financial contribution; it’s about a collective responsibility to uplift society. The letter also mentions that individuals can voluntarily donate money or stocks to the Treasury, showcasing a willingness to contribute beyond mere taxation.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch weighed in on the debate, acknowledging the desire of wealthy individuals to pay more taxes. However, she also pointed out that some remain resistant to the idea, clinging to outdated economic views. As Burnham navigates these discussions, he has not ruled out the possibility of implementing a wealth tax. There are murmurs of a more progressive tax system that could see wealth redistributed from the richest to benefit everyone, especially in regions that have been historically underfunded.

The conversation is ongoing, and as wealth inequality continues to be a pressing issue, the question remains: will the government embrace this call for change? The stakes are high, and the future of the nation’s fiscal policy could hinge on how leaders respond to such bold proposals.

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber

Women in the EU Face €3,900 Annual Pay Gap Compared to Men

The gender pay gap in the EU is not just a statistic; it’s a harsh reality that weighs heavily on millions of women. According to Eurostat, for every

The gender pay gap in the EU is not just a statistic; it’s a harsh reality that weighs heavily on millions of women. According to Eurostat, for every €100 earned by men, women are pocketing only €88.9. This gap, when you look at it on an annual basis, reveals that the average woman is earning almost €3,900 less than her male counterparts each year. This staggering figure comes from estimates by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), which also cites Eurostat data.

Now, let’s break this down: there are about 92.5 million women working across the EU, and collectively, they’re losing over €358 billion annually. Can you believe that? It’s a massive amount! This shocking pay disparity is particularly glaring in countries like Finland, where employed women lose more than €5,000 a year — a staggering €7,592 to be exact. Austria and Germany follow closely, with losses of €6,854 and €6,049 respectively. Even in Sweden, the figure is over €5,000.

When you look at the EU average, which stands at €3,881, countries like Estonia, France, Czechia, and Ireland also show significant annual losses for women, all exceeding €4,000. The situation isn’t much better in the Netherlands (€3,684), Slovakia (€3,487), and Cyprus (€3,405). It’s worth noting that the lowest amount reported is in Belgium, where women lose just €322, while Italy has its own issues, with a loss of €1,557.

Now, let’s not forget that Luxembourg is the only shining star here; women actually earn about €474 more than men annually. But let’s be real — how can we celebrate this when so many countries are dragging behind? ETUC Secretary General Luca Visentini has called this situation “completely unacceptable,” especially after decades of wage discrimination. It’s high time to shed light on this culture of secrecy that has allowed male-dominated boardrooms to continue getting away with such inequalities. “Time is up,” he stated, pushing for change.

Looking at the bigger picture, even just a 10% reduction in this gap could lead to significant increases in earnings for women. Imagine if the average employed woman could make an extra €672 a year! In France, the potential gain would be about €1,069, while in Ireland, it could be around €1,033. Other countries such as Finland, Germany, and Italy would also see noteworthy increases. However, the smallest gain would be in Poland, at just €221, reflecting the smaller gender pay gap there.

And here’s a kicker: ETUC Deputy General Secretary Isabelle Schömann warns that any government dodging its legal duty to implement this Pay Transparency Directive might find themselves facing legal consequences. The gender pay gap varies widely across the EU, ranging from a mere -0.8% in Luxembourg to a staggering 18.8% in Estonia.

So, what’s next? Are we going to let this continue, or will there finally be a push for change? It’s about time we keep our eyes peeled for developments in this critical issue.

Kaynak: Orijinal Haber